"Kylmintä sataan vuoteen v. 2012"

TÄÄLLÄ

Alarmistien korttitalon sortuessa media turvautuu valheisiin

American Thinker


"So science is turned on its head. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is reported by the BBC as a ‘pollutant' and thus all exhaling humans are ‘toxic'. Faith, not science, now prophesies that ‘higher CO2 emissions cause global warming' - even though the actual data reveals global warming ended in 1998, while CO2 emissions continued to rise"

Uusi Maunderin minimi - "Pieni jääkausi uhkaa" ?

SOLAR CYCLE

Tutkimus: Antarktisen reunajäissä ei muutoksia kuuteen vuoteen

THE AUSTRALIAN


"ANTARCTIC ice shelves are showing no sign of climate change, six years of unique research have shown.

Scientists from Western Australia's Curtin University of Technology are using acoustic sensors developed to support the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty to listen for the sound of icebergs breaking away from the giant ice sheets of the south pole.

"More than six years of observation has not revealed any significant climatic trends," CUT associate professor Alexander Gavrilov said yesterday"

Britannian johtava Think-Tank: "Climate change nonsense"

ADAM SMITH Instituutti

Bjorn Lomborg: Ilmastopelottelusta enemmän haittaa kuin hyötyä

Skeptics Handbook


Bjorn Lomborg Taipei Times


Bjorn Lomborg, the director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, is an adjunct professor at the Copenhagen Business School and author of The Skeptical Environmentalist and Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming.


"Worrying excessively about global warming means that we worry less about other things, where we could do so much more good. We focus, for example, on global warming’s impact on malaria — which will be to put slightly more people at risk in 100 years — instead of tackling the half-billion people suffering from malaria today with prevention and treatment policies that are much cheaper and dramatically more effective than carbon reduction would be"

Onko lemmikkieläimen pito kolonialismia ?

Näin ainakin väittää eräs Yalen professori. Lemmikin sijaan pitää puhua "eläintoveristamme". Vihreiden touhuilla ei tunnu olevan mittaa ei määrää, ihmisen
syyllistäminen tarpeettomaksi tunkeilijaksi pallollamme on tavallisimpia mantroja.
Äärimmillään "vihreä" missio johtaa Theodore Kaczynskin eli "Unabomberin" tapaisiin
amokjuoksuihin teollistunutta maailmaa vastaan.


WALL STREET JOURNAL artikkeli



"A Yale professor maintains that owning pets is a kind of species colonialism, an exploitative master-subject relationship. The word "pet" is now viewed as pejorative; if you must hold a creature hostage, call it your "animal companion"

"Theodore Kaczynski, the Unabomber, a Ph.D. with kindred neo-Luddite views, was one such activist run amok, responsible for dozens of injuries and four deaths. He is a case study of how, contaminated with extreme emotion, logic becomes toxic"

Obaman kuolemansuudelma autoteollisuudelle - hybridit eivät käy kaupan USA:ssa

NATIONAL REVIEW

Meteorologi: Lukuisia syitä epäillä "ilmastonmuutosta"

Meteorologin kommentointia


By MICHAEL MOGIL (Mogil is a certified consulting meteorologist, retired National Weather Service employee and a longtime weather educator)


Anthony Watts´in tutkimus US-sääasemien datan luotettavuudesta

Peer-Review - tutkimus: Keskiajan lämpöperiodi faktaa

"Alarmistien" teoria pohjaa oleellisesti nk. Mann´in jääkiekkomailakäyrään, jolla pyritään todistamaan nykyinen lämpötilan nousu (sikäli kuin sitä edes on) johtuvaksi ihmisen toiminnasta. Kahden sveitsiläisen tutkijan vertaisarvioitu tutkimus kuitenkin todistaa keskiajan, noin 1000 v sitten, lämpöperiodista, jolloin nykytilanne olisi aivan normaalia vaihtelua, antropogeenista tekijää ei tarvittaisi selitykseksi.




Täällä TUTKIMUS


"This finding, if true, would be of great significance to the ongoing debate over the cause of 20th-century global warming, because, in the words of Esper and Frank, "heterogeneity alone is often used as a distinguishing attribute to contrast with present anthropogenic warming." On the other hand, if the IPCC's contention is false, it would mean that the warmth of the Current Warm Period is not materially different from that of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), suggesting there is no need to invoke anything extraordinary (such as anthropogenic CO2 emissions) as the cause of earth's current warmth, which does not yet appear to have reached the level experienced a thousand years ago (when there was much less CO2 in the air than there is today), as is indicated by the materials archived in our Medieval Warm Period Project. And, of course, this outcome would also be of great significance"